Suche books:   





The Best and the Brightest
David Halberstam

Ballantine Books, 1993 - 720 pages

average customer review:based on 58 reviews
view larger image
 for more information click here

   highly recommended  highly recommended






Reads as if it were written yesterday, not 28 years ago.

When I read "The Best and the Brightest" I could not believe how fresh it was, despite the fact that it was written in 1972 it feels as if it were written yesterday. I am amazed at how much information Halberstam was able to collect in the late 1960s, before the Freedom of Information Act, and while the war was still raging, about the Vietnam War and the decisions that led up to it. If Halberstam were to sit down today to write this book, with another 30 years of historical documentation available he might write a different book but I cannot see how he could write a better one. Halberstam shows how bad decisions, dishonesty, an unwillingness to face facts and sheer basic stupidity got America into a war that was lost from the start. The amazing thing that this book reveals is how so many smart, well-accomplished people, the best and the brightest of the American foreign policy and military were so incredibly wrong for so incredibly long. I wish that I had read this book a long time ago, I'm glad that I've read it now.


 for more information click here


A dishonest classic that continues to shape the debate

This profoundly dishonest book remains a must-read for students of the Vietnam War and American politics because of its widespread and continuing influence. Halberstam's basic thesis is (1) that Republicans in the McCarthy Era purged the State Department of people who understood Asia, and frightened the Democratic Party into supporting mindless anti-Communist politics in the U.S., (2) when the Kennedy Administration came to power, brutal incompetents in the military, abetted by a gutted State Department, somehow hi-jacked the Vietnam process from underneath Kennedy and McNamara's noses, and (3) succeeded, with the connivance of dim-witted or cravenly career-oriented Ambassadors, Generals, and mostly Republican hotheads lamentably brought into the Kennedy Administration, in escalating the U.S. into the quagmire of the Vietnam War.

The overt moral of "The Best and the Brightest", underlined by its clever title, is that the supposed rationalists and pragmatists of the Kennedy Administration were too clever by half in their belief that they could co-exist with the military and Cold Warrior Republicans, who ultimately bent them to their will and forced the U.S. into the Vietnam War.

Just one example of how preposterously distorted Halberstam's thesis is: Robert A. Lovett, who Halberstam portrays as an old-fashioned, courtly Democrat who was elbowed out of the way by Kennedy and his team of hard-charging pragmatists eager to appease the Republicans, was in fact the biggest support of Curtis Lemay during World War II, when LeMay pioneered the horrifically deadly fire-bombing strategy which killed more Japanese civilians than the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. Lovett fits right in with the Democratic establishment that blundered and deceived its way in to the fiasco of the Vietnam War, he was just a generation older than Kennedy and his guys.

Halberstam's attempt to stick Republicans with the blame for the Vietnam War is pretty thin gruel, disguised with lots of hearty chunks of chewy anecdotes produced by Halberstam's brilliant reporting. It's his over-arching thesis that is flawed. Today, it is clear that it was not the military but the civilians in the Kennedy Administration who were the bullies--willing to sick the U.S. Army onto the Vietnamese, willing to encourage the assassination of President Diem of South Vietnam, willing to do whatever it took to physically intimidate and kill any Vietnamese who got in their way. America now knows all too well that you don't call the military into a political or social situation until it is time to fight. Ironically, the major breaches of this doctrine have been under the Clinton Administration. Halberstam's account of the most politically motivated and controlled war the U.S. has ever fought brilliantly inverts the Vietnam War into a war caused by Republican and military control of a Democratic Administration. It is a fine, scintillitating performance by Halberstam, but it isn't history.

Halberstam and the many similar Vietnam era war correspondents never seem to be able to reconcile the fact that much of their information came from majors, LTCs, Colonels, and even the odd Brigadier General with their thesis that the War was the fault of the military, not two Democratic administrations in a row. The real issue with the military, which is now being examined, is how physically courageous 4 star Generals were so morally craven that they did not speak out or resign when their political masters gave them orders that they new to be fatally flawed strategically, and unconscionable morally.

Highlights of the book include much fine reporting and interesting Kennedy and Johnson-era gossip on figures in the establishment, a blizzard of details that disguises the mendacity and special pleading of the book's over-arching thesis. Finally, one reads the book and recalls the dictum that history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce. The parallels between the Kennedy Administration and the Clinton Administration are astounding.


 for more information click here









 for more information click here


the best introduction to the tragedy of Vietnam

As a view into the making of the Americn elite that got us into the Vietnam mess, the depth of this book is simply unsurpassed. They were so convinced of their brilliance and competence that they could not imagine they could make really big mistakes. And much of that arrogance came from Harvard and old money.

What makes this book tower above the rest is the way that you get to know the major players, from McGeorge Bundy to McNamara to Lyndon Johnson. THey are real people in this book, which brims with the most vivid mini-biographies, fascinating details that make the reader - or at least me - want to dig much much deeper. The details are often incredible, such as the way that McNamara threw himself so deeply into his work that he nearly had a car accident while thinking about re-making Ford or how Bundy faked, brilliantly, having written a paper in prep school by speaking aloud. It all feeds into the portrait of a self-satisfied elite that failed. There is wisdom in the ability to doubt oneself.

While one can quibble with many of Halberstams's points and assertions, as historians are now doing, this is a great place to start to learn about modern American history and government. Its lessons can stimulate a lifetime of study, which it did for me. This book made such a deep impresion on me that it changed my life.

THere is no doubt that this is Halbertam's greatest work. Highest recommendation.


 for more information click here






The definitive account of our entry into Vietnam...

Four and one-half stars...easy to see that although this book came out in 1972, it is the standard by which all other accounts of the Vietnam conflict are measured. I can only second some of the conclusions that other reviewers have (everything that really can be said about this book has been said...). The personal accounts of McNamara, Rusk, Bundy...etc are excellent and all encompassing. The chronology is relatively easy to follow, but Halberstam does get bogged down in details (it seemed to me) and that slowed the narrative down for me. I wholeheartedly agree with the reviewer who concluded that this book had this level of detail without the benefit of references and still tells the story authoritatively. It will take you a while to get through this, but it's worth it and you'll essentially just read re-hashes of this in most other Vietnam accounts. Highly recommended.


 for more information click here


Reads as if it were written yesterday.

When I read "The Best and the Brightest" I could not believe how fresh it was, despite the fact that it was written in 1972 it feels as if it were written yesterday. I am amazed at how much information Halberstam was able to collect in the late 1960s, before the Freedom of Information Act, and while the war was still raging, about the Vietnam War and the decisions that led up to it. If Halberstam were to sit down today to write this book, with another 30 years of historical documentation available he might write a different book but I cannot see how he could write a better one. Halberstam shows how bad decisions, dishonesty, an unwillingness to face facts and sheer basic stupidity got America into a war that was lost from the start. The amazing thing that this book reveals is how so many smart, well-accomplished people, the best and the brightest of the American foreign policy and military were so incredibly wrong for so incredibly long. I wish that I had read this book a long time ago, I'm glad that I've read it now.


 for more information click here


reviews: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, page 8, 9, 10, 11, 12



hot or not?    What's your opinion?     Write a review and share your thoughts!



recommendations

David Halberstam: The Best and the Brightest
America in the 1940s and 1950s
The U.S. invasion of Vietnam
David Halberstam--Books
Political Issues




search for books
best and the, best, brightest


Impressum / about us


Suche books: