books:

	• Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem The MIT Press, 1999 - 430 pages average customer review:based on 3 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

This book is a delightful bunch of mental flowerings. David Chalmers is the nuclear furnace sun around which the rest of these characters orbit. Although it can seem like some are in different galaxies altogether. His explanation is ?Information is phenomenal.? He deftly eludes every attack the others come up with, although this book is not the final round. He admits that his theory is probably wrong, but says this type of speculation is just what we need. My problem is, ?Info is phenomenal, but where does the subject come from, you need a subject for anything phenomenal to be noticed.?

(...)Chalmers is a true scholar and looks like he reads everything written about the subject. If you can?t afford the book, there are hundreds of online papers he?s collected. My final line to you is ?The war is not just in your head.?

for more information click here

Excellent Overview of the "Hard" Problem of Consciousness

Daniel Dennett's physicalist model of the mind (having its basis in Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Neural Networks) claims to explain everything about the working of the mind. Can everything mental be explained by this model? i.e, can all mental properties be reduced to the four entities that constitute the physical: (1) Mass (2) Space (3) Time (4) Electric Charge ?

Not everything has been explained by this model, sayeth David Chalmers. In a famous paper published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies in 1995, Chalmers argued that the "Hard" problem of consciousness remains untouched by physicalist models of the mind --

"Why does the performance of [brain] functions result in experience?"

In other words, why do experiences such as the "sweetness of sugar", or "smell of mothballs", or "blueness of the sky" arise out of the firing of neurons? Why should "experience" arise out of a physical system at all?

Chalmers got 26 responses for his paper, and he even responded to all the responses in a subsequent paper. This book contains all these papers on the subject.

The "Hard" problem of consciousness has been around for a long time. Frank Jackson, Sydney Shoemaker, Joseph Levine have all pointed this out before, and Chalmers has merely highlighted the problem. But he has done a pretty good job of it, for even Daniel Dennett is having a "hard" problem being able to sleep nowadays!

I dropped a star because Chalmers' idea of including "experience" as a fundamental entity is not covered well or convincingly.

for more information click here

for more information click here

A great introduction, a great collection, BUY IT!

This collection begins with an essay by David Chalmers defending the view that no reductive, materialistic account of consciousness can ever be successful.

The rest of the book is made up of over two dozen responses to Chalmers's essay--some supportive, some critical, and some derisive. These responses are written by some of the biggest names in the field, and are followed by a concluding essay, again by Chalmers, in which he tries to defend his own views against what has gone before.

Because of the variety of viewpoints (materialism, dualism, mysterianism) and approaches (neurophysiology, analytical philosophy, quantum mechanics), this collection provides a wonderful introduction to some of the most important aspects of recent work in consciounsess studies. Just check out the table of contents.

As a reductionist myself, I found Patricia Churchland's argument particularly hard to counter, and I think that anyone, regardless of their perspective, will find food for thought in Mark C. Price's wonderful piece.

All in all, the best introduction I have ever encountered to the philosophical study of consciousness.

for more information click here

At the 1994 landmark conference "Toward a Scientific Basis for Consciousness," philosopher David Chalmers distinguished between the "easy" problems and the "hard" problem of consciousness research. According to Chalmers, the easy problems are to explain cognitive functions such as discrimination, integration, and the control of behavior; the hard problem is to explain why these functions should be associated with phenomenal experience. Why doesn't all this cognitive processing go on "in the dark," without any consciousness at all? In this book philosophers, physicists, psychologists, neurophysiologists, computer scientists, and others address this central topic in the growing discipline of consciousness studies. Some take issue with Chalmers's distinction, arguing that the hard problem is a nonproblem, or that the explanatory gap is too wide to be bridged. Others offer alternative suggestions as to how the problem might be solved, whether through cognitive science, fundamental physics, empirical phenomenology, or with theories that take consciousness as irreducible.

for more information click here

hot

or

not?

What's your opinion?     Write a review and share your thoughts!

consciousness

	Stillness Speaks Practicing the Power of Now: Essential Teachings, Meditations, and ... The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist's Personal Journey The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom (A Toltec ...

explaining

	Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social ... Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil Explaining Reading: A Resource for Teaching Concepts, Skills, and ...

hard

	Little Heathens: Hard Times and High Spirits on an Iowa Farm During ... Killing Floor Swan Peak: A Dave Robicheaux Novel The Girl of His Dreams (A Commissario Guido Brunetti Mystery) Phantom Prey (Lucas Davenport Mysteries)

search for books
the hard problem, consciousness, explaining, hard, problem