The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory

books:


	• The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory Henry H. Bauer McFarland & Company, 2007 - 296 pages average customer review:based on 8 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory

A must reed. Very thoroughly researched and annotated. The best book on this sensitive subject.

BRAVO!!!!

This is truly an excellent book. The Orwellian lie that HIV=AIDS=Death is built from a house of cards. The solid science and data presented in this easy to read book pull the key cards from that house. Read this book. You'll want to pass it on to anyone you know who has been pulled into this nightmare called AID$. Thousands of Scientists, PhD's and MD's agree with this book. Doubtful? Hit Google and find out for yourself. You'll have to wade through the AIDS Establishment's tired (and increasingly desperate sounding) barbs and b.s., but the Truth is far more simple and elegant. This book is a wonderful place to start becoming de-programmed. Just get a copy. Thank you, Henry Bauer!

for more information click here

Fantastic

An absolute must read. The book tears to shreads the conventional wisdom of AIDS. This book shows that "HIV +" is totally non-specific and does not correlate with AIDS. It is well referenced and well written. Part 2 is helpful in explaining how everyone has been misled for 24 years and how the lie persists.

Devastating Update on the HIV=AIDS Myth

Henry H. Bauer
The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory
(McFarland & Co, Jefferson, N.C.) 2007
xiv + 282 pages

Comprehensive Critique by Frederic Jueneman

What goes around comes around. Or, so it might seem to the casual observer. Henry Bauer -- despite his calling as an emeritus professor of chemistry and science studies and dean of Arts and Sciences at Virginia Tech -- has moved on from taking on relatively small-fry on the science frontiers, and has now donned the garb of the Man from La Mancha for a major jousting of lances with the credentialed giant windmills of academe, industry, and the federal administration, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, along with their academic and industrial associates, and the World Health Organization, not to mention such mainstream publications as Science, Nature, and Journal of the American Medical Association.

Bauer's argument revolves around a comparatively old controversy by dissident researchers in the HIV/AIDS arena, aptly highlighted by earlier work by retrovirologist Peter Duesberg of UC Berkeley, who himself has been vilified and ostracized by his own compatriots in the medical research community as a heretic for questioning -- actually denying! -- that HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) causes AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). But, the author under review here has taken the additional step of indicting the entire medical scientific community, even those remotely involved in disease research, not merely of massaging the numbers but egregiously holding to false, undocumented premises for the detection and causes of AIDS.

A courageous accusation, indeed!

Bauer actually uses the old saw: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." In fact, he devotes most of Part I "Does HIV Cause AIDS?" of the three-part book on the application -- or rather misapplication -- of statistics by all agencies and individuals who should know better, with the unfortunate result that the captive media feeds the public only the official releases, which we all despairingly know as "Received Wisdom," the orthodox view. The apparent general agreement by the medical community and beguiled public then make for lurid headlines; but again, we are also made acutely aware that consensus is not science. Bauer further shows through many examples that these so-called statistics on HIV are faulty at best, and concludes that upon closer inspection, including that of the most exacting research, shows that there is absolutely no correlation between HIV and AIDS. The dissident researchers had argued this point for years, possibly even decades, but as usual no one heard them amid the media hype to arouse public concerns. Bauer hammers this point home.

Kaposi's sarcoma, a cancerous purple blotching on the skin, has been known as one of the signature diseases of AIDS, along with a specific pneumonia, PCP, as well as a variety of fungal infections. But, Kaposi's sarcoma is now known as not being associated with HIV. Moreover, no "virus" defining HIV has ever been documented, a critically missing piece of data that has troubled serious researchers for years, and which has led to a few ad hoc theories about retroviruses and associated mycoplasms as potential causes. And further, Kaposi's sarcoma has also been found in HIV-negative patients.

Curiously, too, no official explanations are forwarded as to why occasional "infected" HIV-positive newborns come from HIV-negative mothers, children who later through seroconversion become HIV-negative. Duesberg, mentioned earlier, thinks that being HIV-positive means that antibodies have already immunized the body against further infection. Moreover, according to official statistics, some one percent of the population is HIV-positive, which if injudiciously applied on a global scale would mean some 60,000,000 people!

HIV-negative patients who have TB are just given the standard treatment for tuberculosis, while HIV-positive patients with TB are unfortunately relegated to AIDS status and are encouraged to embark on appropriate treatment regimens, such as AZT, a DNA chain-terminator that is unselective between healthy and diseased cells. Many die from such iatrogenic treatments within a few years, thereby fortifying the official "statistics," as AZT recipients exhibit AIDS-like symptoms whether HIV-positive or not.

Dissident investigators, such as virologist Duesberg, Nobel laureates Paul Lauterbur and Kary Mullis, physiologist Robert Root-Bernstein, epidemiologist Gordon Stewart, among many others, including knowledgeable science writers, as Neville Hodgkinson and John Lauritsen, all have pointed out time and again that fast-lane lifestyles and drug usage are, fundamentally, the insults to the body that cause AIDS by devastating the body's own ability to bring its immunoresponse system into play, respecting neither heterosexual nor homosexual, male nor female. And, unlike many venereal diseases, is not sexually transmitted. AIDS has become an "epidemic" that has not happened. The dissenters have used the same official statistics to fortify their own case, but have had to resort to publishing privately or via the Internet, as mainstream journals have been off-limits to their heretical views, and who are otherwise ignored, or at worst accused of being charlatans.

Such mindsets by the establishment are not unknown in the annals of science, as pointed out by Bauer in Part II, "Lessons from History." So many officially prescribed procedures and theories have, over time, been superceded or overthrown by new, enlightened paradigms, as Thomas Kuhn outlined years ago, but the process of science has often been excruciatingly slow, proceeding from "funeral to funeral," as Max Planck once observed. The dissident researchers themselves, nevertheless, have been unrelenting in their quest for truth, despite the roadblocks imposed on their heroic efforts. And yet, many other professional as well as amateur critics have come to the fore, citing the work of Karl Popper, that the counter-arguments are not subject to "falsifiabilty," not being aware that Popper had distanced himself somewhat from that concept early-on with his introduction of critical rationalism.

Notwithstanding, Bauer says, "[T]he presumption that HIV leads inexorably to AIDS [is] something that was never established and in fact is demonstrably false" -- a bit of datum that Bauer never lets us forget. This was also a point detailed at length by well-known author James Hogan, who subtitled his own book "Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible," in the section devoted to "AIDS Heresy in the Viricentric Universe." (See my Review of Hogan's "Kicking the Sacred Cow.) He points out that being HIV-positive is merely an indication that the body's defense mechanism is at work. Thus, the laboratory test for HIV is just an indicator of an effect, not of a cause.

Amusingly, however, biophysicist Paul Lauterbur wrote that "you could write the entire history of science in the last 50 years in terms of the papers rejected by Science or Nature." Now, isn't that a hoot!

What are we to make of all this? Indeed, the public has been duped by so many "official" agencies over the years that it has become inured, or at best disgusted, with what goes on within various establishments, and yet the public still seems to remain amenable to what is being spoon-fed with the pap, the political patronage, that authorities dish out. Bauer goes into this in Part III, "How HIV/AIDS Theory Took and Kept Hold," where he claims, "[E]vidence does not speak for itself," while acknowledging that all models, which attempt to mimic reality, have their limitations. Such models as presented by authorities fall far outside the statistical limits usually applied to such methodologies, as most presumptuously rest on the same erroneous premise.

The systemic problems, which he outlines, and which have existed throughout scientific history, are rarely ever solved to anyone's satisfaction, especially when there are heavy investments in time, energy, and economics made by the participants. He goes on to say, somewhat ameliorating if not apologetic at this point, "Conflicts of interest are so damaging not because so many people are unethical, but because we are all human, doctors and scientists no less than others." And further, "Conflicts of interest are so built into the modern bureaucratic apparatus of science and medicine that these major mishaps are an ever-present possibility." Perhaps so, but this doesn't excuse it.

We are otherwise informed by our scientific colleagues and patrons that hot fusion containment is just 40 years away, something that we'd been told 40 years ago, but we have to believe because cold fusion enthusiasts and researchers don't know what they're doing as all of their viable theories have always been suspect. There are many myths circulating about global warming, but we have to believe because Nobel prizes and other awards are handed out like candy to anyone who speaks "green." String theory has held out the promise of mathematically giving us a theory of everything wrapped up in many multi-variate dimensions, despite frequent encounters with infinities and other mathematical abstractions, and we have to believe since we're not smart enough to understand the complexities involved. Dark matter and dark energy pervade the universe, we are told, because electromagnetism couldn't possibly have the influence that gravity holds, for we therefore have to devoutly believe these mind-boggling pundits, as no one else knows the secrets of the cosmos as well as they. So, systematically, Idiopathic CD4-T-cell lymphopenia is the new non-AIDS condition used to describe the malignancy of HIV-negative patients to avoid admitting that the presence of HIV isn't necessary to cause AIDS, and we have to believe because it's the thing to do, for the media have told us so.

Of course, the list goes on. And on. And on. It's enough to make one an unbeliever, or, in effect, a secular atheist.

for more information click here

reviews: page 1, 2

Thanks to enormous funding for educational programs, the whole world "knows" that HIV causes AIDS. But is what we know compatible with the facts? This book challenges the conventional wisdom on this issue. Collating and analyzing, for the first time, the results of more than two decades of HIV testing, it reveals that the common assumptions about HIV and AIDS are incompatible with the published data. Among the many topics explored are the failings of HIV testing, statistical evidence that HIV is neither sexually transmitted nor increasingly prevalent, and problems caused by the differing diagnostic criteria for AIDS around the world.

But how could everyone have been so wrong for so long? This vital question, unaddressed in previous works questioning the HIV-AIDS connection, is central to this book. The author considers comparable missteps of modern science, and discusses how funding influences discovery in today's scientific circles.

for more information click here

hot