book: 10 defense tactics in inadequate security cases.: An article from: Trial

books:


	• 10 defense tactics in inadequate security cases.: An article from: Trial E. James Burke Association of Trial Lawyers of America, 1997 - 12 pages
	for more information click here

This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on February 1, 1997. The length of the article is 3332 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Lawyers trying inadequate security cases should have a thorough knowledge of the basic principles of negligence law and keep the court and jury's attention on them. This focus will enable the attorney to resist defense attempts to confuse the issue. These attempts may include blaming the assailant or the plaintiff, asserting intervening or superseding cause, misstating the standard of care, using distinguishable case law, claiming the security expert is a hired gun, and seeking victory too early. Defense attorneys in these cases have many ways to shift the blame.

Citation Details
Title: 10 defense tactics in inadequate security cases.
Author: E. James Burke
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: February 1, 1997
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 33 Issue: n2 Page: 50(5)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

for more information click here