Suche books:   



Optimising reintroduction success by delayed dispersal: Is the release protocol important for hare-wallabies? ...
B. Hardman, D. Moro

Elsevier
view larger image
 for more information click here




This digital document is a journal article from Biological Conservation, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
The transfer of threatened animals from one location to another in order to benefit the species is a technique frequently used by animal conservation managers. However, very few of these relocations have experimentally assessed the relative merits and disadvantages of commonly used release techniques. The premise examined in this study was that a higher degree of site fidelity should be advantageous for an individual through a soft release protocol. Two species of hare-wallaby, mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus) and merrnine (Lagostrophus fasciatus), were fitted with radio-collars and reintroduced in August 2001 onto Peron Peninsula in Western Australia. These threatened species were reintroduced using two release strategies (soft versus hard release), and their movements and body condition were monitored, for a period of four weeks post-release, using radio-telemetry and trapping. Each species averaged decreases in body condition index when exposed to both experimental release protocols. A total of 11 animals (32%) emigrated from the release sites, with 10 of these animals being male. Importantly, no relationship was found between site fidelity and release method, although body condition was significantly higher in mala which dispersed, and there was observational evidence for a male-biased dispersal for merrnine. Although the number of released individuals of each species was low, this study demonstrates an interesting trend which indicates that soft release techniques do not necessarily to confer an advantage to the successful immediate establishment and survival of either hare-wallaby species in the short term. We recommend that managers involved with species reintroduction programs consider the costs and potential outcomes of designing and installing soft release enclosures.


 for more information click here



hot or not?    What's your opinion?     Write a review and share your thoughts!








reintroduction

Keiko Speaks: Keiko's True Story Based on His Communications with ...
Once a Wolf: How Wildlife Biologists Brought Back the Gray Wolf ...
The Lobo Outback Funeral Home
Return Of The Wolf To Yellowstone
They Came from the Bronx: How the Buffalo Were Saved from Extinction



conservation

Career Opportunities in Conservation and the Environment (Career ...
Conservation and Biodiversity Banking: A Guide to Setting Up and ...
Essentials of Conservation Biology, Fourth Edition
Conservation Treatment Methodology
Birder's Conservation Handbook: 100 North American Birds at Risk



biological

Galapagos: The Islands That Changed the World
The Host: A Novel
The Warrior Diet: Switch on Your Biological Powerhouse For High ...
Maya Cosmogenesis 2012: The True Meaning of the Maya Calendar End-Date
Cathedrals of Science: The Personalities and Rivalries That Made ...



search for books
biological, conservation, hare-wallabies, important, optimising, reintroduction, wallabies


Impressum / about us


Suche books: